Hey folks! Here I am, the only gila monster in Bangkok International Airport, concealed in the carry-on of my human buddy, Doug, using his one-hour free wi fi to give my final report on this journey. What a journey it was! My original purpose was to convey greetings from the god of Funeral Peak in Death Valley, InsertHere, to his cousin, Tab B, in the Bhutanese Himalayas (keep reading for more on the unusual names), but it turned out they didn't have much to say to each other beyond a conventional "Hello." My real foreign friend was a distant relative of my kind, the tokay gecko, in the mountains near the famed Tiger's Nest monestary. His name is...I'll try to spell it in Engish letters: Ke-ke-ack-a-grrrrp. He explained to me that the term "tokay" is an onomatopoeic representation of its mating call. We had a congenial discussion of the contrast between us, as my kind doesn't have a mating call; we go by smell. I secrete a pheromone that suggests to female gila monsters that a needy male is near, while meanwhile I sniff the ground in search of a pheromone suggesting a female who finds my message interesting. This is the wonder of travel: Meeting other cultures and discovering how for all our differences, we aren't so different after all!
The one-hour free wi fi is closing.
All the best, your world traveler, Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster.
Doug and I rarely co-author, but we were in such alignment on Mindfulness City that we collaborated on this piece. Best, Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster
The proposed Mindfulness City in the south of Bhutan, endorsed by the king of Bhutan and attracting worldwide financial interest, achieves credibility from its connection to Bhutan. The promotional material describes a city incorporating the "green," ecologically sound design and philosophy touted, though missing, from the increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional major cities of the world. There is buy-in from many quarters, but if Mindfulness City were proposed for any other location, its emphasis on IT and vast sums of investment would inspire much skepticism and sarcastic characterization as a billionaire's paradise. We might have joined in such skepticism, but as we near the end of a ten-day tour of Bhutan, we find it hard not to feel that Mindfulness City deserves a chance. Bhutan is unlike any other country in the world. Nestled in the Himalayas between India and China, and subject to potential political pressure and conflict on a par with the tectonic forces that squeeze the Himalayas towards the heavens, the culture and, dare we say, the spirits of the land have evolved to deal with often uncaring forces of the cosmos. For instance, one feels a surprising unity here between working people and all levels of management, up to the king. There is also a unity of religion, through the mystical thought of Buddhism. Within that one religion are a variety of perspectives. Yesterday we meditated on a statue of "Wealth Buddha," seated in deep meditation, a cluster of currency in his hand. Making money is not "bad" in this morality, necessarily.
There's the catch. Mindfulness City will be at the creative edge of the AI and biotech mediated recreation of the human being. We are about to be "improved." Some of the improvement will be long sought and wonderful, for instance the end of diseases that have tormented us. Perhaps "old age" will be improved, developing from its current reality as a state of isolation and slow death, to something worth staying alive for.
But what will the human mind and human nature become? It looks like we'll be able to decide those too. If the goal of Mindfulness City is to churn out genetically uniform, uncomplaining workers, while confining old style humanity to concentration camps- as in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World - that's one thing. But we could also recreate ourselves into wise, unwarlike, loving and positive beings. Making a profit on that would not be essentially bad. Wealth Buddha expresses one of our natures. But there are other Buddhas, other natures to achieve.
As I've made clear, I'm happy to spend the next two weeks on my front porch rocker staring at the San Gabriel Mountains, leaving this quixotic journey to my altered-ego D.L. (who will post about it on https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/) and his unexpected travelling companion, my later-in-life buddy Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster. I have no desire to accompany Robert, who finagled a free ride with D.L. and his skeptical wife, based on his insistence that he has been assigned a mission by the deity residing on Funeral Peak in our own Funeral Mountains near Death Valley (named Tab B - see below for more on the name) to commune with the mountain god (named InsertHere - see below) of Bhutan's highest peak, Gangkhar Puensum, hundreds of miles north of D.L.'s tour. How he will get through airport security, or deal with Bhutan's prohibition against mountain climbing (which is believed to disturb montain deities) is not my concern. I hereby turn over my blog to Robert, as his life has become more interesting than mine. Don't worry about me. I'll be continuing my regime of dreamy contemplation and frequent naps.
All the best, Harry the Human
Here begins Robert's journal of his trip to Bhutan
Day 1
Hi everybody! My usual gloom is gone, as I leave the daily grind of the desert for an environment of rapid change and uncertainty.
I'm curled up in D.L.'s carry-on, chilling in the LAX terminal after using my exceptional mental powers to make myself invisible in the security stations. I fight claustrophobia by exchanging updates with the Bhutanese mountain god, InsertHere (keep reading for more on the name) a visit to whom is the purpose of this journey, at least for me. D.L. has no escape from his "reality." While he frets over the geo-political environment contemporaneous with our trip, I am able to absorb the bigger, "divine" picture, where our immediate world is a nanosecond to the gods. D.L., as a human, does not understand that we mortals are indirect reflections of godhood, of its expressions through nanosecond-long infinities. I don't know how else you could tolerate an airport terminal.
That's it for now. I'll get back to you later tonight with my observatons, if any, about streaking across the sky in a human contraption.
Your Reptilian Servant, Robert
Day 2
I can add to D.L.'s musings about the people in the Taipei airport: No one is thinking about China. They are actually thinking about how tired they are, how nice it would be to have a private jet catered with haute cuisine (not bizarre "French toast" wrapped in foil) and exit proceedures that don't involve crowds of fellow humans attempting to file through the eye of a needle.
I would think, "Wait 'til I tell my fellow gila monsters what human life is like!", but I don't have an audience in my fellow gilas. They regard me as mad for associating with another species, especially this one. Nevertheless, I have chosen this path and must continue.
Another observation: We gilas are sensitive to what humans vaguely refer to as "spirits" or "gods," and I was curious how the spirits of the air have faired with human aircraft invading their realms. As we roared across the Pacific at 35,000 feet, I let my telepathic senses creep beyond the fuselage into the stratosphere, where I sensed, well, nothing. Whatever spirits had roamed up there are gone. Whether they are dead or displaced I could not tell. More on this if I attain further awareness. Meanwhile, after D.L. and Susan finish their ablutions at the Bangkok hotel, I look forward to joining them- incognito of course- in inspecting the bars and massage parlours which, I gather, are a major draw in this tropical land. Your Faithful Reptilian Reporter, Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster.
Day 3
D.L.'s post for our 48 hours in Bangkok is perhaps more interesting than mine. I did not delve into the culture but remained secluded in the hotel room, as I am not concerned much with distinctions between humans, just as you may not want to hear lengthy explanations of local differences between gila monster cultures (yes, there are diffences). I continue focussed on today's flight to Bhutan, where my quest to contact local deities will commence. I'll get back to readers soon! Best, Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster
Day 4
Here we are in Bhutan! I just read D.L.'s meditations on the Buddhist conception of demons and of the relationship between good and evil. It's relevant to me because technically I'm a "beast," a candidate for demon and thus potentially evil. All I can say is that the concepts of good and evil are not found in the "animal world," to which I belong. We just exist. If we want to eat something, we eat it. It's a question of surviving, not of being good or evil.
Meanwhile it doesn't look like I'll be getting much sympathy for my quest to visit a mountain god hundreds of miles north of D.L's tour. It doesn't matter. I've been communing with dozens of gods here. They are very aware of changes coming their way. When D.L. took me yesterday to the world's biggest statue of Buddah (129 feet tall) in Thimphu, I encountered dozens of gods swirling around the temple beneath the statue, in which are 125,000 tiny statues of Buddah, representing the Buddah natures that exist down to the atomic level. It was thrilling, but from a gila monster's point of view, the gods are not always omnipotent or all-knowing; we need to feel that they are to assuage our terror at the seeming chaos of all we see.
D.L. found a book in the lobby shop at Thimphu's Museum of Textiles about phallus worship in Bhutan. One page showed nude men dancing around a bamboo phallus, chanting about their "thunderbolts of wisdom." D.L. is choosing not to write about this, timid soul that he is. I put it out there not because I derive any particular meaning from such narcissistic meditations, but because I wonder what females might call the vagina. How about, "Receptacle of the Thunderbold of Wisdom?" No? Sorry, I am a gila monster after all. I think D.L. is sorry he took me on this trip. Too late now.
I watch as day follows day in the desert, daring me to find meaning in the endless cycle. This morning I had some assistance on the "meaning" front from Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster, who woke me at dawn with his signature scratching on my cabin door, which was of course accompanied by intrusive thoughts. This as I was trying to catch up on sleep after fitful impulses the night before had kept me awake until the wee hours. Here's the dialogue that ensued, hopefully with elements meaningful to the reader:
Robert: Harry, wake up! It's the end of the world!
Me: For a change.
Robert: Listen to me, Harry. Red lines are being crossed.
Me: Red lines?
Robert: That's the phrase your news sources use to describe an action or situation that pushes an individual or group to the point where they cannot continue to be rational, and must express their frustration with hate-filled speech or violence.
Me: I suppose you're referring to the Middle East, or Russia vs Ukraine, where crossing red lines is the norm?
Robert: Of course those regions, but crossing red lines has become the norm everywhere. Go to the Family Dollar Store in Pearblossom today and check out the mind of a random customer [Robert and I are telepathic]. You'll find something to the effect of, "I can't take this any more!"
Me: Robert, I could have slept another three hours. What do you expect me to do about this? In fact, by waking me up you crossed one of my red lines!
Robert: I have more to tell you, Harry. You'll recall our discussion of my upcoming trip - this Thursday, in fact, yes, Thanksgiving Day! - to Bhutan with D.L. [author of Lasken's Log at https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/], the part about the "Tsen," the ancient gods which were retained when Bhutan adopted Buddhism?
Me: Uh huh, various gods of woods and streams, and one with a weird name.
Robert: Yes, a mountain god named InsertHere, to whom I'm supposed to offer greetings from the god of our own Funeral Peak near Death Valley, named Tab B. I've already explained their unusual names.
Me: Right, something to do with cultural appropriation. What's that got to do with waking me at dawn?
Robert: Harry, I'm learning through the god network that there are Bhutanese gods I didn't know about, who have been awakened by the human conflicts and are angrier than you are about losing sleep.
Me: Like what gods?
Robert: Like Dorje Legpa, described by local monks as a wrathful female deity associated with elevated terrain and the natural world, often depicted as red and holding a vajra- a Buddhist symbol of spiritual power- and a scorpion, believed to protect against harm and bring good fortune.
Me: What's the problem, then? She's wrathful, but also protective.
Robert: It's the wrathful part that's waking up, looking around to see who woke her and why.
Me: Was it war in the Middle East?
Robert: Not by itself. It's the worldwide attention, the buy-in, the belief that the war is real.
Me: Isn't it real?
Robert: Yes, because it's made real by forces no one has the strength to counter. No one is able to make it not real.
Me: Can't a god make a war not real?
Robert: Not in this case. Dorje Legpa is as pissed off as the humans. And she's not the only pissed god in Bhutan.
Me: Oh great. Who else?
Robert: There's Mhakala, another "wrathful deity," often depicted as black with multiple arms, considered a protector of the dharma and a powerful force against obstacles.
Me "Protector of the dharma"? What's the difference between "dharma" and "karma"?
Robert: In simple terms: Dharma is about doing what is right and fulfilling your purpose, while karma is about the consequences of your actions, both good and bad.
Me: Robert, you got that from Gemini, Google's AI, didn't you? I recognize the style!
Robert: I...Ok, so what? I use many sources.
Me: It's hard to see how an AI could rationally describe a god, since they are natural competitors.
Robert: How do you figure?
Me: Like a god, AI knows more than we mortal biological systems do and is destined to control us.
Robert: Speak for your own kind, Harry. Gila monsters will never be controlled by either gods or AI!
Me: That's comforting to hear. Anyway, are there more angry gods?
Robert: Yes, there's Dzambhala, described as "the god of wealth and prosperity," often depicted as yellow and holding a mongoose that vomits jewels, believed to bring good fortune and abundance.
Me: What's Dzambhala pissed about?
Robert: He was awakened from a sensuous dream about drinking the bejeweled vomit of a mongoose, but awakened for what? He wonders, “Where’s the money in this?”
Me: I get the picture. I ask again, what exactly do you want me to do about it?
Robert: Not much, since you're not going to Bhutan with me and D.L. I intend to commune with the Bhutanese gods, perhaps make offerings and see what I can do to help them reverse the suicidal impulses of the Earth, which is tired of circling the sun forever without purpose. I will try to suggest purpose.
Me: Robert, you are a nut-case. You have about as much hope of saving the world as a gila monster lost and confused in the desert. Oh wait, that's what you are!
Robert: Laugh if you must, Harry, but at least I'm reaching out to the gods, expressing alternate views from the planet's biosphere, not just catching up on sleep, like the sad insomniac you are! I'll let you get back to bed. Pleasant dreams, Harry.
And with that Robert trudged off to pursue his hobby of influencing the universe by talking with gods. To each his own. Though I must confess Robert did arouse some guilt in me - over my laziness, my defeatist mindset- but not enough to keep me from going back to a deep sleep and dreaming that a mongoose sucked up what's left of my estate and vomited it onto the desert floor.
When I woke I thought of Bob Dylan's song, "With God on Our Side," though he meant "God," singular. If possible it seems advantageous to have a god on your side, but you should be careful which god.
Shortly after I read in the Pearblossom Gazette that a local troupe was putting on a production of Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot" at the Pearblossom Community Playhouse, I realized there was no point in trying to hide my excitement from Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster, and indeed he came scratching at my door within minutes.
Robert: Don't even think about going without me! You know I love Theater of the Absurd!
Me: You are theater of the absurd.
Robert: Come on, Harry, don't be cross. This is important. How often do you get to see a play about absurdity in the middle of a desert?
Me: Every day.
But I knew it was a losing battle. Several times Robert has maneuvered himself into my care and, smuggled into the folds of my jacket, watched movies with me (this would be the first play). These outings had mixed results (keep reading), but I knew there was no stopping him.
Me: Fine, just try not to interrupt the show more than usual.
Robert: I look forward to it! You know, Harry, for all my derision of your species, you do appreciate your own absurdity. It's a joy to see!
And so that very evening Robert and I embarked on the 10 minute drive to the Playhouse. As in the past while waiting in line, I had Robert tucked into my partially zipped windbreaker. Since we're both telepathic, there was no need to vocalize.
Robert: Harry, I've been scanning the playgoers, and I must say you've got a cultured crowd out her in Gila Land!
Me: Yes, various civilization deniers, like me. Some look like retired college professors, or ceramic artists. I see one teenage boy by himself, how sad is that?
Robert: What's sad about it? And might I add, Harry, that in no way are you a "civilization denier."
Me: What do you mean? I'm attending Theater of the Absurd in the desert with a gila monster. That's got to be denying something.
Robert: Maybe, but not civilization.
Me: Meaning what?
Robert Do you not have a can opener in your kitchen?
Me: It's twist-style!
Robert: So? It was developed by human technology, as was the can. No such things exist in nature.
Me: Robert, I can see you're going to be the great companion you've been at our past shared events.
Fast forward 5 minutes and I'm in my seat, looking at the bare stage with the scrawny tree, almost forgetting Robert breathing against my chest. "You might call that tree absurd," I thought.
Robert: Don't forget I'm reading your mind, Harry. Let's take a moment to examine the word "absurd," before you start labelling the poor tree.
Me: Robert, have I ever told you that what you call intellectual discussion is actually you repeatedly correcting me?
Robert: Many times. To the point, "absurd" is from Latin "surdus," meaning "muffled, unclear," then in the 17th Century it became a mathematical term meaning "irrational number."
Me: What's that?
But before Harry could answer the lights dimmed and two lost souls lumbered on stage, joined soon by a philosophical slave driver and his "thinking" slave, the four of them joined by the one rational character, an 8 year old boy who delivers messages from the elusive Godot. Harry's interjections stopped and did not resume until the play was over. He was entirely fascinated by these characters' never-ending search for meaning, barely moving throughout the play, his reptilian mind concentrating on every word. Of course, he lit up like a firecracker during curtain call.
Robert: Harry, OMG, honestly there's no species like yours, I mean, to mock your own absurdity so openly! Any gila who tried this would be mauled to death by the rest of us.
Me: Well, maybe gilas aren't absurd.
Robert: Are you kidding? You know, for clarity it might help if we resume our pre-show conversation and define "absurd."
Me: Be my guest.
As we stepped out into the cool evening, under a black sky with sparkly stars scattered across a possibly absurd universe, Robert continued.
Robert: As noted, "absurd" comes from Latin "surd," meaning, roughly, "hard to see." Then it became a mathematical term meaning "irrational number."
Me [as I placed Robert on the front passenger seat]: And what is that?
Robert: It's a number that can't exist, like the square root of 2. Something is absurd, then, if it can't exist.
Me: That's absurd, Robert. Would you see a play about people who talk about numbers that can't exist? And by the way, all numbers can't exist. They are mental constructs, not real things.
Robert: Harry, you get more absurd every time I talk to you. The point about the people in the play is that the reason, or purpose, or point of their existence is not clear, and is in that sense absurd.
Me: So anything that's not clear is absurd? That's absurd.
Robert: Harry, you turn your own species' great art into a cheap logic puzzle, which, it must be said, is absurd.
As usual, Robert was ruining the post-show glow I should have been feeling after a fine play (performed, FYI, by stellar local talent) like Waiting for Godot. In sheer frustration and desire to change the subject, I turned on the car radio, which was tuned to NPR, and we heard an account of how lame-duck President Biden had, in private (with no reports of agents drugging or hypnotizing him) authorized Ukrainian use of US supplied long-range missiles against Russia.
Robert: If that isn't theater of the absurd I don't know what is.
We drove the rest of the way in silence, the starry sky looking down at us in seeming denial of its absurdity.
Looking for something to read that's not an analysis of the Trump win? Try The god who masturbated the world into being on Lasken's Log at https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/.
"You never know what will happen next" is actually true these days. For instance, I didn't know that Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster, who keeps me grounded in my self-imposed exile, would, late last night, claw at my door as agitated as I've ever seen him, though in an oddly optimistic way, his thoughts intruding: "Harry, wake up! Doug's going to Bhutan!" he buzzed through the airways (he was referring to my altered-ego Doug, author of Lasken's Log at https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/). Sitting in the confines of my living room, Robert relaxed and explained:
Robert: D.L. and his wife are going to Bhutan, leaving Thanksgiving day!
Me: That's nice.
Robert: Do you even know where Bhutan is?
[With no mention to Robert, I had purchased and was wearing the new AI glasses that listen to your conversation, anticipate a crises when you should know something but don't, then project the missing information onto the lenses. This was my first attempted application.]
Me: Yes, historically and politically Bhutan is a distant world (except for current tourism), walled off by the Himalayas which tower 4,000 feet above the already 10,000 foot elevated valley floors, then surrounded by China, Tibet, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Southeast Asia and the rest of the world.
Robert: What else, besides what your new AI glasses can tell your disabled human mind?
Me: What do you mean? What else what?
Robert: What else is special about Bhutan?
Me: You tell me.
Robert: Will do. When Buddhism came to Bhutan it did not conquer. It was slowly and peacefully adopted, and often the locals retained original gods of the region in their versions of Buddhism.
Me: Oh yeah? Like which gods?
Robert: Some heavy-duty gods that roamed the Earth until they were inhibited by modern times. For a while it seemed they were gone, but they quietly reappeared in Bhutan.
Me: What are these gods like? Do they have names?
Robert: They are referred to collectively as the Tsen. They influence various things. Yulha and Zhidak are territorial, often protecting open grassland or forests. The Lu are water deities, watching over rivers and lakes. The Chenrezig are personal spirits that protect homes or villages.
Me: Will Doug and his wife give offerings to the Tsen?
Robert: I couldn't tell you. The only god of the Tsen I care about is InsertHere, one of the Zhidag, the mountain deities. Often the Zhidag are attached to volcanoes, but Bhutan sits on tectonically squished, impervious rock so there are no volcanoes. InsertHere is the deity of Gangkhar Puensum, the highest peak in Bhutan, towering 14,000 feet over the already 10,000 foot elevated Bhutanese valleys.
Me: Ok, it sounds interesting, I guess....
Robert: Listen to me, Harry, InsertHere is the cousin of our own Tab B!
Me: Who?
Robert: Tab B, the deity of Funeral Peak, in the Black Mountains outside Death Valley.
Me: What kind of name is Tab B for a mountain deity? For that matter, what kind of name is InsertHere?
Robert: Those are not their original names. No one knows what those were. Modern explorers slept at the foot of these peaks and had strange dreams, sometimes waking up mumbling gibberish. The names were derived from the gibberish, for better or worse. Anyway, Tab B is a major telepathic force in the western deserts. Gilas commune with him all the time, which is why I intend to travel to Bhutan with Doug.
Me: What!?
Robert: It was Tab B's idea. He's somewhat estranged from his cousin and wants me to contact InsertHere and compare notes on what's happening in the world, human and otherwise.
Me: You're going to need a god's help to figure this out. How will you get past airport security, not to mention Doug's wife?
Robert: With help from a mountain deity, you'd be surprised what you can do.
Me: I don't suppose you've run this by Doug.
Robert: He's processing it.
Me: I bet.
Stay tuned! Robert and I will be posting updates as Thanksgiving day approaches. [Check for D.L.'s updates at Lasken's Log at https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/
Oh brillig was the slithy tove
All mum with crap that he had sold
So on he went, as we are told
A goal in mind, a windy road
A nematode, but I digress
Our subject still a wilderness
Wherein such souls as look askance
At superficial happenstance
Can waddle in the cosmic dance
And ask the question should the chance
Present itself, or even not-
For questions ask their own true selves
Forgiving answers to themselves-
And truth be told I need more rhymes
Not once not twice but three more times!
I'm writing in response to some of my altered-ego D.L.'s ideas (expressed on Lasken's Log at https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/) in which he seeks to prove the existence of machinations designed to ensure that we walk into World War III with our eyes open, thinking we are awake though we are deep in a pre-scripted dream. As I gape at Doug's stamina in constructing proofs (or at least support) for his ideas, I can't help sitting on my rocker on the front porch of my desert abode, looking out over the baked Mojave and wondering if I should be sorry that long ago I stopped trying to prove things. Now when I argue with my frequent companion Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster, he will barrel down on me for the slightest variance from his opinion, yet if he opposes mine, I just stop trying, frustrating him no end.
What is all this about "proving" things, anyway? It's not like we ever really prove anything. What if standard humans were telepathic and evolved to share ideas, to have them together at the same time, and to change our minds about those ideas together? I bet there would be no less certainty about reality than if aggressive humanoids invaded and started proving things.
That's my quick thought for now! Best, Harry
Addendum: Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster, it turns out, was crouched outside my cabin scanning my mind as I wrote the Quick Thought above. His intrusive mental barks jolted my creative space just as I hit the "submit" button:
Robert: Harry, you defeatest! So you're through proving things, and to cover your collapse you now claim, without proof I might add, that nothing can be proved?
Me: The correct form is proven, Harry.
Robert: Oh is that the correct form? Can you prove it! Ha! Ha! [It turns out you can laugh telepathically.] You sad sack, Harry! Proving something just means you give a reason why you think it. If you've given up on that, you're probably well on your way to La-La Land, where I'm sure you'll make many new friends.
And with that I heard the soft splatter of Robert's urine against my cabin. The next morning I learned that Robert is able to write with his pee, adding for the purpose a special dye that stains whatever the receiving medium - in this case my front door - a bright orange. Confirming my suspicion that Robert is a narcissistic pest with whom I associate only to avoid too much of my own company, I beheld on the lower end of my cabin door Robert's poem, squirted, I assumed, in response to the previous night's exchange:
Listen to the raindrops:plink...plink... plink...
Saying something clear yet
indistinct.
Watch the swirling foam going
down the sink,
and you'll agree with me about
what I think.
I would rebut Robert's thesis but that would violate my new principles.
[My desert companion Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster, in his fascination with the human race, has culminated a long study of Shakespeare with this cross-species emulation.]
How is't
though all we teach our young
be naught but dreams we teach ourselves
that we
in the throes of later-aged ambition
to be more upon the stage
than aged babes
(domestic ciphers, suckling, passive, small accounted in the public eye,
sweeping dust to dust and daily circling mile on mile)
in quiet contemplation
hidden watch the generations flow?
As everywhere impetuous glories
spill from young and restless minds
to cause calamitous clash
and magnificent ornament of the soul,
the children uprooted on life’s playground
by the rousing slap
and challenge of the intellect’s
swampy doubt
think not of quiet corners
but of noisy triumph on the field!
Demanding that we set aside
The limits of our scope
And take them on a joyous ride
Of certitude and hope
[This is a guest essay from my altered-ego D.L.'s blog, Lasken's Log: https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/.]
Early Hollywood films often featured cute baby chimpanzees who mimiced
human behavior with infantile gestures, grimaces and clownish antics.
But, although there are plenty of adult lions, elephants and giraffes in
early movies, there are no adult chimps. Adults were retired to
"reserves" far out of the city. Chimp handlers knew why, but the
general public did not.
That changed over recent decades as a series of horrifying attacks by adult
chimps on humans were reported in the media. Adults can weigh up to
200 pounds and are generally twice as strong as the average adult human
male. The attacks entailed faces and genitals torn off, hands
amputated and other targeted attacks that appeared designed, not necessarily
to kill, but to permanently debilitate the victim both physically and
psychologically. The victims typically were taken by
surprise. Often the chimp had been raised by the victim from babyhood,
or the victim might be a friend of the owner who knew the chimp well, or
thought so. The trigger for many of the attacks appeared to be
jealousy, or a sense of betrayal. One woman brought a birthday cake to
a captive adult chimp (removed from her custody for dangerous behavior) in
the company of two other chimps. One was so jealous of the cake that
he bit off the womans lips and nose and destroyed one eye. A man who
brought a toy to a chimp he knew lost his genitals when he tried to take
back the toy. It is now illegal to own a chimp as a pet.
While our society was learning about the nature of adult chimps in
captivity, scientists were learning about chimps in the wild. Search
"chimp attacks in Africa" and you'll find beautifully shot narratives by
producers like Discovery and Planet Earth-BBC Wildlife depicting a
murderous species, often out to expand its territory. In one
program, a band of five or six adult male chimps, led by its alpha male (the dominant male animal in a particular group- Webster) silently creeps through the forest, stalking a neighboring
colony of chimps. The alpha, who not only determines the group's
behavior but defines its virtues, deficits and moral tone, brings the group
to a halt as the "enemy" comes within earshot. The males huddle
together in intense, intimate concentration. The group attacks and
manages to capture a baby chimp from the neighboring group, which they kill
by pulling off its limbs, after which they sit in a circle, gnawing on the
limbs and sharing them with each other.
More recently, the Netflix documentary "Chimp Empire," directed by James Reed, presented an intimate look at chimps interacting in which they appear surprisingly human. In fact chimps are our
closest relatives. Human DNA differs from chimps' by only 1%. In
contrast, human DNA differs from dogs' by 75%. The difference between
apes (like chimps) and monkeys (like capuchins) is 7%, meaning that we are
closer to chimps than chimps are to monkeys.
Chimps pre-date us by about 5 million years, so we are likely spin-offs from them, appearing about 300,000 years ago. Maybe it was the chimps who drove us from the forest.
[Note: Our DNA is likewise only 1% different from the chimps' nearest
relation, bonobos. In the 70's and 80's, bonobos were touted as
"flower-children chimps" because of their uninhibited displays of
affection- including social conventions like handling each other's genitals or rubbing
them together- and the lack of male combat. The hippie
association was dropped after researchers noticed that many males were
missing thumbs, which had been bitten off by females in this matriarchal
alternative to chimp patriarchy.]
As with humans, not all chimps are murderous. A Discovery
UK episode tells the story of two peaceable chimps, Hare and Ellington,
who, though members of a large warlike group, spent their days together in
tranquil strolls through the forest. One day Ellington was beaten and
mauled to death by members of the group. Hare then wandered alone,
depressed and distracted, finally finding his place taking care of baby
chimps orphaned by his group.
Are we like chimps in behavior as well as DNA? A study of human
history suggests that we are. Many anthropologists speculate that
homicidal impulses in our ancestors explain the absence today of any
other types of humans than our own. There is fossil evidence that
there were other types of humans, notably Neanderthals and
Denisovans. Genetic analysis indicates that we interbred with
these humans, but we also witnessed their extinction. There is no
evidence that we intentionally eliminated them (an action we would now
term "genocide"), but the question remains, where are they?
We are proud of our hunting heritage, but unlike, say, lions, who
after millions of years of hunting and eating impalas and giraffes
have not caused the extinction of those animals, human prey tends to
disappear. There is plenty
of evidence that needless killing of fauna and megafauna has recurred throughout human history. One prehistoric example that is generally not noted in deference to a need to idealize early North American cultures (science writer Jared Diamond is one of the few to refuse this idealization) is that all large mammals on the North American continent- like giant ground sloths and wooly mammoths- disappeared shortly after the arrival of the first humans, 10,000-12,000 years ago. The later settling of the American West by Europeans provides further examples of animals
slaughtered in numbers far exceeding people's need to eat them. When
Europeans arrived in North America, passenger pigeons comprised up to 40%
of the bird population, their migrations filling the sky.
"Sportsmen" would fire straight up and revel when dozens of birds fell to
the ground. From an estimated 3 to 5 billion pigeons when the
Mayflower docked at Plymouth Rock, their numbers fell in two hundred years
to zero. The American bison (commonly called the "buffalo") numbered
around 30 million before Europeans came. Horace Greeley wrote in
1860 that, "Often, the country for miles in all directions had seemed
quite black with them." The railroads sold tickets for bison killing excursions to New
Englanders looking for adventure. When herds of bison ran across the
prairies near the tracks, rifles were issued to passengers so they could
shoot them from train windows. The train did not stop to recover the
mounds of carcasses for any sort of use. Today the bison is designated
"near threatened." "How the West was won" should be rephrased as, "How
the West was cleared of lifeforms that suggested humans are not the dominant
species."
Back to genocide- the modern term for humans intentionally killing (or
attempting to kill) entire groups of other humans- we often treat it as a
recent aberration stemming from Hitler (the term "genocide" was coined in 1944 by a Polish lawyer), but far from being unique to World War II,
genocide- which continued after the war and is ongoing today- has occurred
repeatedly since the dawn of humanity, starting, possibly, with the
disappearance noted above of any other sorts of humans than us, the
Denisovans going extinct about 80,000 years ago, the Neanderthals about
40,000.
Moving forward, there is archaeological evidence that the
Indo-Europeans (from whose language group almost all current European
languages derive) committed genocide in the course of their expansions
starting around 4,000 BC.
Something genocidal appears to have struck ancient Britain, as there is
genetic evidence of a 90% population turnover in the 3rd millennium
BC. This could help explain how genetic analysis of "Cheddar Man," a
10,000 year old skeleton found in Somerset, England, could suggest that he had
"quite dark skin and blue eyes" (The power of archaeology and genetics, NewScientist Magazine, 5/29/21). We've been wondering for a long
time who built Stonehenge. Surprise!
In historical times, both the Athenian city-state and the Roman Empire, to take two examples,
achieved much of their stature through genocide. The list of genocides
after the Romans is long, covering all continents.
The quest for empire and hegemony- straight from the chimpanzee playbook-
seems a prime factor in human genocide. Since the advent of large
civilizations around 3,000 BC, it's been one alpha male ambition after
another, producing brutal, genocidal empires that are then toppled by the
next empire-building alpha, which is toppled by the next. It seems
never to have occured to people that one might just live happily munching
leaves, replacing glory and bloodlust with the simple pleasures of a
satisfied existence, not unlike the lifestyle of another of our close ape
relatives, gorillas (whose DNA differs from ours by
1.75%).
In fact the idea of just existing is repulsive to many people; we
call it "vegetative," as if we know what it's like to be a
plant. We think we are supposed to manage everything, maybe even
dominate everything, as our choice of comic book "superheroes"
shows.
I see the tendency in myself, at least in my childhood taste in
fictional heroes, such as those from the TV series Star Trek. Was it
the spectacle of Captain James T. Kirk of the starship Enterprise
and cutting edge of the human race, landing on one planet after another,
subduing its inhabitants, always winning? Or First Officer Spock
(half-human, half-alien, a hybrid alpha) who matched Kirk's ability to
dominate the environment but went beyond it by also dominating his inner
self? Of course Kirk and Spock were depicted in each episode
as gaining the moral high ground by adhering to Starfleet's "Prime
Directive," that none of the ship's missions would interfere with
indigenous cultures. That's why it's called science fiction.
Where does the chimp and human animus come from? What happened in the
ancient forests of Africa, to us and to chimps? As William Blake
phrased the question (though addressing a tiger):
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
Scientists are not asking that question, but they are tangentially
finding out interesting things about alpha males, in particular that there
is a correlation between alpha males and a high level of the "flight or
fight" drug serotonin, produced in a cluster of cells in the human
brainstem called the raphe nuclei. When the raphe nuclei send a
large dose of serotonin into the amygdala- a brain center that controls our
emotional state- the amygdala directs us to become alphas and run the
show. Submissive mice have been transformed into alpha's after
injections of serotonin, and alphas have been demoted when their serotonin
is decreased.
Interesting, but the question becomes, why did the ancient raphe nuclei
feel the need to squirt so much serotonin into men's amygdalas? We get
a shitload, which is probably why we can't stand a sky full of
pigeons.
There's not much evidence to explain what humanity's raphe nuclei have been so agitated about, so once again we must guess. My guess is that we and our chimp cousins
experienced non-belonging. The forest had rejected us in some fundamental
way. We did not fit. Chimpanzees reacted to this ostracism by
terrorizing each other into a structured existence calibrated for survival. Humans fought back
by becoming ever smarter and more resourceful. Some of the response was
practical, bringing development of improved hunting implements and use of
fire. Some was psychological, as when ancient Egyptians built giant
pyramids to inflate the standing of the ruling alphas and humble the working class (many pyramid workers were paid) and
slaves. Some was suicidal, as when, in our time, we learned how to
blow up and poison the planet, threatening the alphas along with everyone
else. Perhaps we secretly hate the Earth and resent Creation for
sending us here.
Genesis tells the story metaphorically. After Adam and Eve are
expelled from Eden, the Earth is revealed as inhospitable, requiring people
to build artificial environments lest they starve or freeze. We're
not the only creatures who have to do this: birds build nests; beavers build
dams. But humans need to reconstruct the whole forest, the whole
world.
There is growing understanding that our quest to reform the Earth under
the guidance of the alpha male (and an enabling Eve) has gone awry.
As the dream of a compatible Earth flounders, we turn to space- with its
endless planets full of monsters to defeat, hellscapes to terraform and indigenous cultures to leave in pristine
condition- hoping the effort out there will go better than it has
here.
The question this essay asks is, what is the future of the alpha male who
has guided us to this point? We are acquiring biological tools that
will enable us to recreate ourselves. Through CRISPR technology we
will be able to assemble our DNA into any combination of characteristics we
want. If we envision a new way, one that seeks co-existence rather
than dominion, we could, maybe, downgrade or phase out the alpha male (and alpha female, since we fluctuate now between chimp and bonobo) and create a
more harmonious version of ourselves.
The fly in the ointment is that the people in charge of our re-creation
will likely be alphas who are motivated to make vast fortunes and
dominate the humans around them. The chimps and bonobos will be in charge, driven
by their terror of not being in charge.
What can we do about this? Limit the supply of serotonin?
It's unclear. Stay tuned for Part II of this post:
How to ensure that the new humanity is not as homicidal and generally
berzerk as the current one.
As I watched the current highly promoted movie, "Civil War", I had the recurring thought: "This is stupid." Yet I did not walk out, as I sometimes do. Why not?
The characters look and speak like contemporary Americans, but the politics is fiction. The US has ruptured into factions that are at war with each other, but there is no mention of MAGA or Blue and Red zones, no clear casus belli. Everyone is just fighting. We get a general picture of coalitions between states- unexplained and sometimes improbable, like California joined with Texas- who fight against other coalitions of states. The federal government is isolated and besieged, with the President barricaded in the White House, trying to organize supportive factions against the "Secessionists," who are not identified.
The protagonists are improbable too. They are war photographers obsessed with getting as close to the carnage and pain as possible, looking for that one great career-building "shot." They are improbable because they are cast as heroic, implying that what they are doing is good or helpful, an idea which, like the politics of the story, is unexplained. The group of four war photographers- led by a very stern Kirsten Dunst- travels through dangerous territories on their way to the White House, where they plan to interview the President, a feckless, desperate man who makes empty, slogan filled speeches.
There is one indicator of xenophobic ideology in the story, when a rural militant asks a captive where he is from. The man answers, "Hong Kong." The militant exclaims, "China!" and shoots him. To my many readers in Hong Kong, Singapore and China I ask: Are there people in the world who do not want us to mingle and find commonality? It would seem so.
Now I need to fill in a unique element of this movie-going experience: My desert companion Robert the Telepathic Gila Monster was tucked into my partially zipped jacket, watching the movie with me. Readers will recall the disaster that unfolded the last time I smuggled Robert into a movie theater (see below, "Harold Pinter through the eyes of a gila monster"), when Robert, an unusually opinionated reptile, went wild with tirades against movie criticism included in the film, exposing his presence to other theater-goers and necessitating our hasty retreat. Robert, who monitors my thoughts several times a day, gathered that I planned to see "Civil War" without him and pleaded for another chance. I relented after he promised to remain silent throughout the film, communicating with me- provided it was important- via telepathy only, no vocalizations like last time. [Note for new readers: I am one of about 5,000 human telepaths in the world. All gilas are telepathic, however they consider telepathy with creatures beyond their species an abhorrent perversion. As you'll see in posts below, Robert has been exiled from his clan for being such a pervert. I take some of the blame.]
Not surprisingly, Robert did not obey my stricture against constant intrusion of his thoughts during "Civil War." He was quiet for the first 20 minutes of the film- a litany of scenes showing people blown apart or tortured- but suddenly he could not contain himself:
Robert : Jeez, what is it with your species? No wonder you took over the world.
Me: Robert, please don't start with your superior species routine. Look at yourselves: Gila monsters don't love.
Robert: Yes they do, you just can't see it. All you see is a male gila sticking it in, then sprinting away to the next gig, while the female gazes into the distance thinking,"Hmm, it's a nice morning." But you forget, gilas are telepathic. That male is sprinting away, but an orgasmic telepathic flame shoots between him and his love, lasting for hours. Eat your heart out!
Me: Robert, I am trying to follow this movie, and you are making that difficult.
Robert: Why? Are you afraid you'll miss a critical plot element, maybe explaining why the cute girl needs to get two feet from the face of the man coughing blood and take multiple pictures of him from various angles? Don't expect that to be explained, Harry.
Me: Ok, well, not to totally disparage my species, but I'll admit that sometimes I get an involuntary kick out of the violence in movies like this, especially things blowing up, though I don't like the gore and pain that often goes with things blowing up.
Robert: There you go, Harry! Humans are drawn to explosions. Every time you see something blowing up in outer space you get excited. You love that our sun is itself an atomic bomb going off. So different from gilas!
Me: How so?
Robert: We're just chicken. Explosions do not thrill us at all. That's why we live in the desert; it's nice and quiet out here.
Me: Then why did you want to see this movie?
Robert: It's part of my study of your species.
Me: I see. What have you learned so far?
Robert: This movie reenforces my view that humans are drawn to matter breaking apart, to fission, to, as it were, destruction.
Me: Why would we be that way? What's the evolutionary advantage?
Robert: You get sustenance from the juices emerging between atoms as they're ripped apart, and you must take your juices where you can. Humanity was expelled from evolution's womb prematurely, and the world has been a confusing threat to you ever since. You fight the world because it fights you.
Me: Robert, should I start a religion where you sit on my shoulder and I speak your holy words?
Robert: Hey, it's your life.
Me: One last question: What do you think humans should do about their situation?
Robert: Like I would know?
I apologize to readers who were hoping for more enlightenment from this post. Actually I thought Robert's reply was enlightened enough. Maybe he and I should start a sect whose spiritual message is, "We don't know." That's certainly the message I got from this movie.